PyVista vs vedo
A data-driven comparison of two Python 3D & scientific visualization libraries: popularity, development activity, licensing and installation. Updated .
Key differences
- PyVista has 1.7× as many GitHub stars as vedo (3.9K vs 2.3K).
- PyVista had more development activity over the last 12 months: 928 commits vs 284.
- PyVista is downloaded 59× as often on PyPI (466.3K vs 7.9K per week).
- Both are released under the MIT license.
By the numbers
- PyVista
- vedo
Show data as a table
| Metric | PyVista | vedo |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | 3,870 | 2,274 |
| PyPI downloads / week | 466,263 | 7,913 |
| Commits, last 12 months | 928 | 284 |
| Contributors | 218 | 41 |
| Forks | 677 | 278 |
Development activity
Commits per month to each default branch, last 12 complete months.
- PyVista
- vedo
Show data as a table
| Month | PyVista | vedo |
|---|---|---|
| Nov 2025 | 53 | 0 |
| Dec 2025 | 44 | 1 |
| Jan 2026 | 36 | 1 |
| Feb 2026 | 55 | 108 |
| Mar 2026 | 31 | 18 |
| Apr 2026 | 114 | 103 |
| May 2026 | 48 | 22 |
| Jun 2026 | 39 | 2 |
| Jul 2026 | 34 | 6 |
| Aug 2026 | 130 | 2 |
| Sep 2026 | 251 | 0 |
| Oct 2026 | 93 | 21 |
Side by side
| Attribute | PyVista | vedo |
|---|---|---|
| Description | 3D plotting and mesh analysis through a streamlined interface for the Visualization Toolkit (VTK) | Library for scientific analysis and visualization of 3D objects based on VTK. |
| Category | Python 3D & scientific visualization libraries | Python 3D & scientific visualization libraries |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Language | Python | Python |
| Status | Active | Active |
| Latest release | v0.49.1 () | v2026.6.3 () |
| Last commit | ||
| Repository created | ||
| Open issues | 430 | 170 |
| Install | pip install pyvista | pip install vedo |
Which should you choose?
Popularity and activity are only part of the story. Consider which ecosystem you work in, the chart types and interactions you need, how much data you render, and whether the license fits your project. Both tool pages list alternatives if neither is quite right.